Against a Postmodern Pentecostal Epistemology

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Issue Date

2013

Authors

Davis, Richard Brian, 1963-
Franks, W. Paul

Advisor

Artist

Creator

Editor

Photographer

Type

Article

Keywords

Pentecostalism
Narrative epistemology
Truth
Bible. Gospels

Citation

Accepted Manuscript (AM) Citation: Davis, Richard B. and W. Paul Franks. “Against a Postmodern Pentecostal Epistemology.” Philosophia Christi 15 (2013): 1-17.

Abstract

In this paper we explore the idea that pentecostalism is best supported by conjoining it to a postmodern, narrative epistemology in which everything is a text requiring interpretation. On this view, truth doesn’t consist in a set of uninterpreted facts that make the claims of Christianity true; rather, as James K. A. Smith says, truth emerges when there is a “fit” or proportionality between the Christian story and one’s affective and emotional life. We argue that pentecostals should reject this account of truth, since it leads to either a self-refuting story-relativism or the equally problematic fallacy of story-ism: favoring one’s own story over others without legitimate reason. In either case, we contend, the gospel itself is placed at risk.

Table of Contents

Publisher

Evangelical Philosophical Society

Copyright Notice

Copyright, Evangelical Philosophical Society. All rights reserved.

Rights License

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License

Rights License Link

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

Alternative Title