Show simple item record

dc.rights.licenseAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Licenseen_US
dc.contributor.authorDavis, Richard Brian, 1963-
dc.contributor.authorFranks, W. Paul
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-23T16:26:12Z
dc.date.available2021-12-23T16:26:12Z
dc.date.copyright2015
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.citationDavis, Richard Brian and W. Paul Franks. “Counterpossibles and the ‘Terrible’ Divine Command Deity.” Religious Studies 51, no. 1 (2015): 1-19en_US
dc.identifier.issn0034-4125en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://digitalcollections.tyndale.ca/handle/20.500.12730/1187
dc.description.abstractIn a series of articles in this journal, Wes Morriston has launched what can only be considered a full-scale assault on the divine command theory (DCT) of morality. According to Morriston, proponents of this theory are committed to an alarming counterpossible: that if God did command an annual human sacrifice, it would be morally obligatory. Since only a ‘terrible’ deity would do such a ‘terrible’ thing, we should reject DCT. Indeed, if there were such a deity, the world would be a terrible place - certainly far worse than it is. We argue that Morriston’s nonstandard method for assessing counterpossibles of this sort is flawed. Not only is the savvy DCT-ist at liberty to reject it, but Morriston’s method badly misfires in the face of theistic activism - a metaphysical platform available to DCT-ists, according to which if God didn’t exist, neither would anything else.en_US
dc.format.mediumPaperen_US
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf/uaen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherCambridge University Pressen_US
dc.rightsCopyright, Cambridge University Press. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_US
dc.subject.lcshMorriston, Wesen_US
dc.subject.lcshDivine commands (Ethics)en_US
dc.subject.lcshEthicsen_US
dc.subject.lcshGod (Philosophy)en_US
dc.titleCounterpossibles and the ‘Terrible’ Divine Command Deityen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationTyndale Universityen_US
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Philosophyen_US
dc.contributor.repositoryTyndale University, J. William Horsey Library, 3377 Bayview Ave., Toronto, ON, M2M 3S4, Canada. Contact: repository@tyndale.caen_US
dc.identifier.doidoi:10.1017/S00344251400016Xen_US
dc.identifier.issueNo. 1en_US
dc.identifier.journalReligious Studiesen_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-4608-6172en_US
dc.identifier.volume51en_US
dc.publisher.placeCambridge, UKen_US
dc.rights.holderhttps://www.cambridge.org/about-us/rights-permissionsen_US
dc.subject.keywordMorriston, Wesen_US
dc.subject.keywordDivine command theoryen_US
dc.subject.keywordMoralityen_US
dc.subject.keywordSacrificial scenarioen_US
dc.description.chapterpage1-19en_US
dc.description.notePermission for digitization not granted by Cambridge University Press.en_US
dc.description.noteFor AODA accommodation, including help with reading this content, please contact repository@tyndale.caen_US
dc.description.versionOffprinten_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Davis, Richard B.
    Dr. Richard B. Davis is Professor of Philosophy and Chair, Department of Philosophy at Tyndale University.
  • Franks, W. Paul
    Dr. W. Paul Franks is Associate Professor of Philosophy.

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License