dc.rights.license | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Davis, Richard Brian, 1963- | |
dc.contributor.author | Franks, W. Paul | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-12-23T16:26:12Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-12-23T16:26:12Z | |
dc.date.copyright | 2015 | |
dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Davis, Richard Brian and W. Paul Franks. “Counterpossibles and the ‘Terrible’ Divine Command Deity.” Religious Studies 51, no. 1 (2015): 1-19 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0034-4125 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://digitalcollections.tyndale.ca/handle/20.500.12730/1187 | |
dc.description.abstract | In a series of articles in this journal, Wes Morriston has launched what can only be considered a full-scale assault on the divine command theory (DCT) of morality. According to Morriston, proponents of this theory are committed to an alarming counterpossible: that if God did command an annual human sacrifice, it would be morally obligatory. Since only a ‘terrible’ deity would do such a ‘terrible’ thing, we should reject DCT. Indeed, if there were such a deity, the world would be a terrible place - certainly far worse than it is. We argue that Morriston’s nonstandard method for assessing counterpossibles of this sort is flawed. Not only is the savvy DCT-ist at liberty to reject it, but Morriston’s method badly misfires in the face of theistic activism - a metaphysical platform available to DCT-ists, according to which if God didn’t exist, neither would anything else. | en_US |
dc.format.medium | Paper | en_US |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf/ua | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Cambridge University Press | en_US |
dc.rights | Copyright, Cambridge University Press. All rights reserved. | en_US |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | en_US |
dc.subject.lcsh | Morriston, Wes | en_US |
dc.subject.lcsh | Divine commands (Ethics) | en_US |
dc.subject.lcsh | Ethics | en_US |
dc.subject.lcsh | God (Philosophy) | en_US |
dc.title | Counterpossibles and the ‘Terrible’ Divine Command Deity | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Tyndale University | en_US |
dc.contributor.department | Department of Philosophy | en_US |
dc.contributor.repository | Tyndale University, J. William Horsey Library, 3377 Bayview Ave., Toronto, ON, M2M 3S4, Canada. Contact: repository@tyndale.ca | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | doi:10.1017/S00344251400016X | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | No. 1 | en_US |
dc.identifier.journal | Religious Studies | en_US |
dc.identifier.orcid | https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4608-6172 | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 51 | en_US |
dc.publisher.place | Cambridge, UK | en_US |
dc.rights.holder | https://www.cambridge.org/about-us/rights-permissions | en_US |
dc.subject.keyword | Morriston, Wes | en_US |
dc.subject.keyword | Divine command theory | en_US |
dc.subject.keyword | Morality | en_US |
dc.subject.keyword | Sacrificial scenario | en_US |
dc.description.chapterpage | 1-19 | en_US |
dc.description.note | Permission for digitization not granted by Cambridge University Press. | en_US |
dc.description.note | For AODA accommodation, including help with reading this content, please contact repository@tyndale.ca | en_US |
dc.description.version | Offprint | en_US |