dc.rights.license | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Smith, Aaron P. B. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-04-12T17:41:43Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-04-12T17:41:43Z | |
dc.date.copyright | 2016 | |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Smith, Aaron P. B. . “Redeeming the Rejected: Curious George and Evidence-Based Approaches.” Qualitative Social Work 15, no. 5-6 (2016): 671-681. (DOI: 10.1177/1473325016652675) | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1741-3117 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://digitalcollections.tyndale.ca/handle/20.500.12730/2453 | |
dc.description.abstract | The author’s recent participation in a doctoral course on epistemology and the nature of social work knowledge produced an inner struggle regarding the validity of positivist and evidence-based approaches to social work practice and research. This article seeks to share some of this struggle as many social workers, students, and researchers have and continue to encounter debates regarding the use of evidence-based approaches in social work practice and research. The dichotomous nature these debates often take has often resulted in the exclusive embracing, defending and perpetuation of evidence-based approaches or the complete rejection and discarding of such approaches. The
author suggests in this article that social workers, researchers, and academics consider an alternative approach to the debate. | en_US |
dc.format.medium | Paper | en_US |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | SAGE | en_US |
dc.rights | Copyright, SAGE. All rights reserved. | en_US |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | en_US |
dc.subject.lcsh | Evidence-based social work--Research | en_US |
dc.subject.lcsh | Knowledge, Theory of | en_US |
dc.subject.lcsh | Social work | en_US |
dc.subject.lcsh | Social work education | en_US |
dc.title | Redeeming the Rejected: Curious George and Evidence-Based Approaches | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Wilfrid Laurier University | en_US |
dc.contributor.department | Faculty of Social Work | en_US |
dc.contributor.repository | Tyndale University, J. William Horsey Library, 3377 Bayview Ave., Toronto, ON, M2M 3S4, Canada. Contact: repository@tyndale.ca | en_US |
dc.identifier.bibrecord | https://tyndale.on.worldcat.org/oclc/49941718 | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | DOI: 10.1177/1473325016652675 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | no. 5-6 | en_US |
dc.identifier.journal | Qualitative Social Work | en_US |
dc.identifier.orcid | https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2036-2810 | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 15 | en_US |
dc.publisher.place | Thousand Oaks, Calif. | en_US |
dc.rights.holder | Copyright, SAGE. All rights reserved. | en_US |
dc.subject.keyword | Epistemology | en_US |
dc.subject.keyword | Social work | en_US |
dc.subject.keyword | Social work education | en_US |
dc.subject.keyword | Evidence-based social work | en_US |
dc.description.chapterpage | 671-681 | en_US |
dc.description.note | Permission for digitization not granted by SAGE | en_US |
dc.description.note | For AODA accommodation, including help with reading this content, please contact repository@tyndale.ca | en_US |