Show simple item record

dc.rights.licenseAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Licenseen_US
dc.contributor.authorDavis, Richard Brian, 1963-
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-08T18:48:34Z
dc.date.available2023-05-08T18:48:34Z
dc.date.copyright2002-06
dc.date.issued2002-06
dc.identifier.citationDavis, Richard Brian. “Haecceities, Individuation and the Trinity: A Reply to Keith Yandell.” Religious Studies 38, no. 2 (June 2002): 201-213. DOI: 10.107/S0034412502006005en_US
dc.identifier.issn0034-4125en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://digitalcollections.tyndale.ca/handle/20.500.12730/2594
dc.description.abstractIn this paper I reply to Keith Yandell’s recent charge that Anselmian theists cannot also be Trinitarians. Yandell’s case turns on the contention that it is impossible to individuate Trinitarian members, if they exist necessarily. Since the ranks of Anselmian Trinitarians includes the likes of Alvin Plantinga, Robert Adams, and Thomas Flint, Yandell’s claim is of considerable interest and import. I argue, by contrast, that Anselmians can appeal to what Plantinga calls an essence or haecceity – a property essentially unique to an object – to distinguish Trinitarian members. I go on to show that the main Yandellian objection to this individuative strategy is not successful.en
dc.format.mediumPaperen_US
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherCambridge University Pressen_US
dc.rightsCopyright, Cambridge University Press. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_US
dc.subject.lcshYandell, Keith E., 1938-en_US
dc.subject.lcshTrinitariansen_US
dc.subject.lcshTheismen_US
dc.subject.lcshTrinityen_US
dc.subject.lcshPlantinga, Alvinen_US
dc.subject.lcshHaecceity (Philosophy)en_US
dc.subject.lcshIndividuation (Philosophy)en_US
dc.titleHaecceities, Individuation and the Trinity: A Reply to Keith Yandellen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationTyndale University College & Seminaryen_US
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Philosophyen_US
dc.contributor.repositoryTyndale University, J. William Horsey Library, 3377 Bayview Ave., Toronto, ON, M2M 3S4, Canada. Contact: repository@tyndale.caen_US
dc.identifier.bibrecordhttps://tyndale.on.worldcat.org/oclc/980501957en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.107/S0034412502006005en_US
dc.identifier.issueno. 2en_US
dc.identifier.journalReligious studiesen_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-4608-6172en_US
dc.identifier.volume38en_US
dc.publisher.placeCambridge, UKen_US
dc.rights.holderhttps://www.cambridge.org/about-us/rights-permissionsen_US
dc.subject.keywordYandell, Keith E., 1938-en_US
dc.subject.keywordAnselmian theistsen_US
dc.subject.keywordTheismen_US
dc.subject.keywordTrinitariansen_US
dc.subject.keywordAnselmiansen_US
dc.subject.keywordTrinityen_US
dc.subject.keywordPlantinga, Alvinen_US
dc.subject.keywordHaecceity (Philosophy)en_US
dc.subject.keywordIndividuation (Philosophy)en_US
dc.description.chapterpage201-213en_US
dc.description.noteAccepted manuscript is not available for uploading to the TDC repositoryen_US
dc.description.noteFor AODA accommodation, including help with reading this content, please contact repository@tyndale.caen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Davis, Richard B.
    Dr. Richard B. Davis is Professor of Philosophy and Chair, Department of Philosophy at Tyndale University.

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License