Show simple item record

dc.rights.licenseAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Licenseen_US
dc.contributor.advisorNgien, Dennis, 1958- (Advisor)
dc.contributor.authorZeeb, Janelle Louise
dc.identifier.citationZeeb, Janelle Louise. “An Analysis of Clark Pinnock's Open Theism as a Potential Solution to Theodicy.” M.T.S., Tyndale University College & Seminary, 2015.en_US
dc.descriptionBibliography: leaves 124-126en_US
dc.description.abstractClark Pinnock has been one of the most notable advocates of open theism; an idea which has been gaining ground over the last few decades. This thesis will examine Pinnock's understanding of open theism as pertains to the issue of theodicy, and will compare and contrast it with traditional views of theodicy. This is done in order to determine if open theism is able to provide a more coherent version of theodicy which is pastorally comforting to Christians who face suffering. As theodicy is a key issue when comparing different theological systems, the ability or inability of open theism to address theodicy in a way that is more compelling than traditional options is an important test to determine whether open theism should be allowed as an orthodox Christian option. Chapter 1 explains the importance of theodicy as a test for any theological system, examines Pinnock's personal theological background and journey, and gives a short summary of the controversy surrounding open theism. Chapter 2 discusses in detail how three views of God's sovereignty (divine determinism, simple foreknowledge views, and open theism) understand God's omnipotence, omniscience, human freedom, and theodicy, in order to compare these systems' advantages and problems for theodicy. Chapter 3 lays out four specific advantages of Pinnock's open theism as relates to theodicy: it affirms God's character is perfectly good, it takes spiritual warfare seriously, it preserves human moral responsibility, and it encourages Christians to work against evil. Chapter 4 examines common objections to open theism's implications for theodicy. The main issues are the claim that divine determinism is more comforting to Christians than open theism, that open theism reduces the ability to trust God's guidance, that in open theism God is still guilty of allowing evil to occur, that open theism reduces God's glory, and finally, that open theism's theodicy is not supported by Scripture. Each criticism is responded to by Pinnock, supported by other open theists, in order to show that open theism can address these issues in a consistent and convincing manner.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsIntroduction – Definitions and Important Concepts – Implications of Open Theism for Theodicy – Criticism of Open Theism's Implications for Theodicy and Rebuttals by Open Theists – Conclusionen_US
dc.format.extentvii, 126 leavesen_US
dc.publisherTyndale University College & Seminaryen_US
dc.relation.hasversionPrint version, available in Tyndale University. Archives. Print version, available in Tyndale University. Library, BT 83 .587 .Z443 2015en_US
dc.rightsCopyright, Janelle Louise Zeeb, managed by Tyndale University. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.subject.lcshPinnock, Clark H., 1937-2010en_US
dc.subject.lcshOpen theismen_US
dc.subject.otherDissertations, Academic--OWOBC--Tyndale Seminaryen_US
dc.titleAn Analysis of Clark Pinnock's Open Theism as a Potential Solution to Theodicyen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationTyndale University College & Seminaryen_US
dc.contributor.committeeMemberPedlar, James E., 1979- (Committee Member)
dc.contributor.repositoryTyndale University, J. William Horsey Library, 3377 Bayview Ave., Toronto, ON, M2M 3S4, Canada. Contact: repository@tyndale.caen_US
dc.identifier.callnumberBT 83 .587 .Z443 2015en_US
dc.rights.holderThis Work has been made available by the authority of the copyright owner solely for the purpose of private study and may not be copied or reproduced except as permitted by the copyright laws of Canada without the written authority from the copyright owner.en_US
dc.subject.keywordPinnock, Clark H., 1937-2010en_US
dc.subject.keywordOpen theismen_US
dc.description.noteFor AODA accommodation, including help with reading this content, please contact repository@tyndale.caen_US of Theological Studies (M.T.S.)en_US
dc.description.degreeThesis (M.T.S.)—Tyndale University College & Seminary, 2015en_US

Files in this item


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License