Now showing items 1-8 of 8

    • God and Counterpossibles 

      Davis, Richard Brian, 1963- (Cambridge University PressCambridge, UK, 2006)
      In this paper I critically examine Brian Leftow’s attempt to construct a theistic semantics for counterpossibles, one that can be used to make sense of the fact that propositions, which exist necessarily, nevertheless ...
    • Haecceities, Individuation and the Trinity: A Reply to Keith Yandell 

      Davis, Richard Brian, 1963- (Cambridge University PressCambridge, UK, 2002-06)
      In this paper I reply to Keith Yandell’s recent charge that Anselmian theists cannot also be Trinitarians. Yandell’s case turns on the contention that it is impossible to individuate Trinitarian members, if they exist ...
    • Layman’s Lapse: On an Incomplete Moral Argument for Theism 

      Davis, Richard Brian, 1963-; Franks, W. Paul (Center for InquiryAmherst, NY, 2013)
      C. Stephen Layman contends that an argument supporting theism over naturalism can be constructed based on three defensible, non–question-begging premises about the moral order. Previous critics of Layman’s argument have ...
    • The Metaphysics of Theism and Modality 

      Davis, Richard Brian, 1963- (Peter Lang PublisherNew York, 2001)
    • Oppy and Modal Theistic Proofs 

      Davis, Richard Brian, 1963- (Evangelical Philosophical Society in cooperation with Biola UniversityLa Mirada, Calif., 2009)
      I argue that Graham Oppy’s attempt to redefend his charge that all modal theistic arguments “must be question-begging” is unsuccessful. Oppy’s attempt to show that theism and modal concretism are compatible is not only ...
    • Plantinga’s Defence and His Theodicy are Incompatible 

      Davis, Richard Brian, 1963-; Franks, W. Paul (RoutledgeNew York, 2018)
    • Reply to Critics 

      Davis, Richard Brian, 1963- (Bloomsbury AcademicLondon, UK, 2019)
    • Response to Paul Helm 

      Davis, Richard Brian, 1963- (Bloomsbury AcademicLondon, UK, 2019)